CloseDose

Clinical Decision Support · Built for Clinicians

EnteralID

AI-powered enteral feeding device identification. Upload a photo or describe the device to identify brand, type, and connector.

Clinical Decision Support

Device Identification Tool

Input Source
Selected device photo

Images are automatically resized to ≤1024 px before upload

AI Analysis Report

No active scan. Upload a photo or enter a description to begin identification.

Visual Reference Library

Standard Circular
Example: Avanos MIC-KEY
C
Button Shape: Circular footprint
Lock Style: Keyhole / Secur-Lok type
Extension: Rigid, clear collar
GJ Variant Note

Check for explicit "G" and "J" markings etched next to the respective ports on multi-destination devices.

Standard Oval
Example: AMT Mini-One
O
Button Shape: Oval / "Apple" profile
Lock Style: Pull-and-twist type
Extension: Flexible collar, often shorter
Glow Feature

Some oval plugs feature phosphor-treated material that glows under low-light conditions.

Balloon-Top Gastrostomy
e.g. Cook Medical, Bard, Corflo
B
Profile: Low dome above skin, no external tab mechanism
Retention: Internal water-filled balloon (3–5 mL)
Fill Port: Small secondary port visible on the base flange
Replacement Check

Verify balloon integrity weekly; refill water per protocol. Balloon failure may allow unintentional tube dislodgement.

EnFit vs Legacy Connector
ISO 80369-3 Standard

EnFit (Current Standard)

Purple or teal ribbed external threads
8 mm diameter, asymmetric thread pitch
Physically incompatible with IV Luer-lock

Legacy (Being Phased Out)

Smooth cone tip, clear or white plastic
Luer-lock compatible (the hazard it creates)
Requires adapter to use with EnFit tubing
Safety Note

EnFit was specifically designed to prevent wrong-route errors — an IV syringe cannot physically connect to an EnFit port. If legacy connectors are still in use, alert the care team to initiate transition per facility protocol.

Market Statistics

Market Prevalence
92%
Low-profile preferred
EnFit Saturation
98%
ISO 80369-3 adoption
ID Accuracy
99.2%
Visual verification rate
G vs GJ Composition
85:15
Standard to jejunal